Petersen et al v. Petersen et al
Filing
30
Minute Order. Proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael North: Motion Hearing held on 11/5/2014 re 19 First MOTION to Quash Notices of Depositions filed by Kenneth Petersen, Sr., Karen Ruiz Petersen, Carter Properties, L.L.C., 14 MOTION to Compel filed by Lorraine Petersen, Richard Petersen. (Court Reporter Arlene Movahed.) (lag)
MINUTE ENTRY
NORTH, M.J.
NOVEMBER 5, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LORRAINE PETERSEN, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NUMBER: 14-1516
KENNETH PETERSEN, SR., ET AL.
SECTION: “B”(5)
HEARING ON MOTION
COURT REPORTER: Arlene Mohaved
APPEARANCES:
Lindsay Reeves, Candace Murphy
MOTION:
(1)
(2)
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel (Rec. doc. 14).
Defendants’ Motion to Quash (Rec. doc. 19).
:
Continued to
:
No opposition
1, 2 :
Opposition
ORDERED
:
:
Dismissed for failure of counsel to appear.
:
Granted.
:
MJSTAR(00:15)
Dismissed as moot.
Denied.
1, 2 :
Other:
1: The Court was advised that responses to Plaintiffs’ discovery requests
have been provided by the Petersens. As required by Rule 37(a)(1), counsel
are to meet and confer prior to the filing of any motion challenging the
sufficiency of those responses. Defendant, Carter Properties, LLC, having
failed to respond to Plaintiffs’ written discovery requests, Plaintiffs’ motion is
granted as to it. Carter Properties is to respond to Plaintiffs’ outstanding
discovery requests within one (1) week. Plaintiffs’ request for expenses and
attorney’s fees is held in abeyance.
2: Counsel are to confer on available dates for the depositions of Defendants
in the first half of December. By the close of business on November 12, 2014,
the parties may supplement their respective submissions with respect to the
hardship that would reportedly be visited upon Defendants in having to
travel to New Orleans for their depositions. The Court will then determine
the situs of the deposition.
MICHAEL B. NORTH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?