Cantrelle v. Clayton et al

Filing 55

ORDER denying as moot 51 plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment to Enforce Settlement; FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees is DENIED. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 11/4/15. (sek)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DANA CANTRELLE CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 14-1776 WILLIAM V. CLAYTON, ET AL. SECTION: J(3) ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment to Enforce Settlement (Rec. Doc. 51), which includes a request for attorneys' fees, and an Opposition thereto (Rec. Doc. 54) by Defendants, William V. Clayton, Forby Contracting, Inc., and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Considering the parties' pleadings and the fact that the settlement has been consummated since the filing of Plaintiff's motion, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees is DENIED because Plaintiff failed to allege that Defendants acted in bad faith "to delay and frustrate a settlement agreement." E.N. Bisso & Son, Inc. v. World Marine Transp. & Salvage, Inc., No. 94-0690, 1996 WL 28520, at *5 (E.D. La. Jan. 23, 1996). New Orleans, Louisiana this 4th day of November, 2015. ____________________________ CARL J. BARBIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?