Williamwest v. Barack Obama, et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 - IT IS ORDERED that Williamwests complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 4/24/15.(jjs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DODIYI J. WILLIAMWEST CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 14-2330 BARACK OBAMA, ET AL. SECTION: R(5) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is plaintiff Dodiyi Williamwest’s complaint,1 defendant Marlin Gusman’s answer,2 the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation,3 and Williamwest’s objections4 and supplemental objections5 to the Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate judge recommends that Williamwest’s claims be dismissed for want of prosecution for failing to pay the required filing fee or to submit a completed pauper application. The Court, having reviewed de novo Williamwest's complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and Williamwest's objections to the Report and Recommendation, approves the Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion, with the addition of the following discussion. In his objections, Williamwest does not challenge the precedent cited by the Magistrate Judge or raise any arguments disputing the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 1 R. Doc. 1. 2 R. Doc. 5. 3 R. Doc. 7. 4 R. Doc. 8. 5 R. Doc. 9. Instead, he simply reiterates allegations set forth in his complaint. The Court need not reiterate the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Williamwest’s complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). New Orleans, Louisiana, this 24th day of April, 2015. _____________________________________ SARAH S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?