Williamwest v. Barack Obama, et al
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 - IT IS ORDERED that Williamwests complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).. Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 4/24/15.(jjs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
DODIYI J. WILLIAMWEST
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO: 14-2330
BARACK OBAMA, ET AL.
SECTION: R(5)
ORDER AND REASONS
Before the Court is plaintiff Dodiyi Williamwest’s complaint,1
defendant Marlin Gusman’s answer,2 the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation,3 and Williamwest’s objections4 and supplemental
objections5 to the Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate judge
recommends that Williamwest’s claims be dismissed for want of
prosecution for failing to pay the required filing fee or to submit
a completed pauper application. The Court, having reviewed de novo
Williamwest's
complaint,
the
record,
the
applicable
law,
the
Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and Williamwest's
objections to the Report and Recommendation, approves the Report
and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion, with the addition
of the following discussion.
In
his
objections,
Williamwest
does
not
challenge
the
precedent cited by the Magistrate Judge or raise any arguments
disputing the Magistrate Judge's analysis.
1
R. Doc. 1.
2
R. Doc. 5.
3
R. Doc. 7.
4
R. Doc. 8.
5
R. Doc. 9.
Instead, he simply
reiterates allegations set forth in his complaint.
The Court need
not reiterate the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Williamwest’s complaint be
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 24th day of April, 2015.
_____________________________________
SARAH S. VANCE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?