Olivier v. Cain et al

Filing 26

ORDER AND REASONS : ORDERED that Olivier's Motion to Stay Proceedings, Record Doc. 20 , is GRANTED. Further proceedings addressing Olivier's petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 are hereby STAYED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case for all administrative and statistical purposes. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Olivier and defense counsel must notify this court in writing immediately upon resolution of the questions accepted by the Supre me Court on writ of certiorari in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 135 S. Ct. 1546 (2015). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that either party may move to re-open this matter within thirty (30) days of resolution of the questions accepted by the Supreme Court on writ of certiorari in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 135 S. Ct. 1546 (2015). Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Wilkinson, Jr on 6/18/2015. (my)(NEF:NJB)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
RONALD OLIVIER

CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS

NO. 14-2773

N. BURL CAIN, WARDEN

SECTION “G”(2)

ORDER AND REASONS
The petitioner, Ronald Olivier, filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. §
2254. The petition asserts that Olivier’s sentence to life in prison without benefit of
parole, imposed when he was a juvenile, is unconstitutional under the United States
Supreme Court’s holding in Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012), and that the state
courts erred in refusing to apply Miller on collateral review of his sentence. The State
filed an answer in opposition to the petition arguing that it was not timely filed because
it was filed more than one year after Olivier’s conviction was final and Miller did not
create a new rule of law retroactively applicable on collateral review. Record Doc.
No. 15.
Olivier has now filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings, Record Doc. No. 6, in which
he requests a stay of further proceedings in this case to await a determination by the
Supreme Court on the issue of the retroactive application of Miller. Olivier references
a petition for writ of certiorari recently granted in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 135 S. Ct.
1546 (2015), in which the Supreme Court apparently will consider Miller’s retroactive

application on collateral review and the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction to consider the
Louisiana Supreme Court’s refusal to apply Miller retroactively.
The Orleans Parish District Attorney’s Office, representing the respondent and the
State, has filed a response to the motion, which acknowledges the possible application
of any Supreme Court decision in Montgomery and states that respondent has no
opposition to the motion to stay. Record Doc. No. 23. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Olivier’s Motion to Stay Proceedings, Record Doc. No. 20,
is GRANTED. Further proceedings addressing Olivier’s petition for issuance of a writ
of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 are hereby STAYED. The Clerk of Court
is directed to CLOSE the case for all administrative and statistical purposes.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Olivier and defense counsel must notify this
court in writing immediately upon resolution of the questions accepted by the Supreme
Court on writ of certiorari in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 135 S. Ct. 1546 (2015).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that either party may move to re-open this matter
within thirty (30) days of resolution of the questions accepted by the Supreme Court on
writ of certiorari in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 135 S. Ct. 1546 (2015).

18th
New Orleans, Louisiana, this __________ day of June, 2015.

JOSEPH C. WILKINSON, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CLERK TO NOTIFY
HON. NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN
2