Spikes v. Seal et al

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 . IT IS ORDERED that James Spikes, Sr.s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the defendants, Sheriff Randy Seal, former District Attorney Walter Reed, and former Assistant District Attorney L eann Wahl, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous, for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted, and/or for seeking relief against an immune defendant in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and § 1915A. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 2/10/2016.(bwn)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
JAMES SPIKES SR.

CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS

NO. 15-0147

RANDY SEAL, WALTER REED,
LEANN WAHL

SECTION “E”(4)

ORDER
The Court, having considered the record, the applicable law, the Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of the plaintiff to file an
objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter.
Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that James Spikes, Sr.’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the
defendants, Sheriff Randy Seal, former District Attorney Walter Reed, and former Assistant District
Attorney Leann Wahl, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous, for failure to state a
claim for which relief can be granted, and/or for seeking relief against an immune defendant in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and § 1915A.
February
New Orleans, Louisiana, this ______ day of _____________________, 2016.
10th

____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE