Kaplan v. Kaplan
Filing
5
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 . Signed by Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance on 5/14/15.(jjs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
SCOTT KAPLAN
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO: 15-272
JANE KAPLAN
SECTION: R(3)
ORDER
Before the Court is plaintiff Scott Kaplan's complaint against
his ex-wife Jane Kaplan seeking money allegedly owed to him under
the parties' Illinois state-court divorce decree.1
On January 30,
2015, the Magistrate Judge ordered plaintiff to show cause by March
2, 2015 why the case should not be dismissed for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction and improper venue.2
Plaintiff failed to
respond to the Magistrate Judge's show cause order, and the
Magistrate Judge authored a Report and Recommendation ("R&R")
recommending that the Court dismiss plaintiff's action for lack of
subject-matter jurisdiction and improper venue.3 Plaintiff has not
filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's R&R.
The
Court
has
reviewed
the
plaintiff's
complaint,
the
applicable law, and the Magistrate Judge's unopposed R&R, and
hereby approves the R&R and adopts it as its opinion.
1
R. Doc. 1.
2
R. Doc. 3.
3
R. Doc. 4.
Accordingly, plaintiff Scott Kaplan's complaint is hereby
dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction
and improper venue.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this _____ day of May, 2015.
14th
SARAH S. VANCE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?