Emilien v. Jefferson Parish et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs complaint, insofar as it can be construed as a request for habeas corpus relief, is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust available state court remedies. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff file an amended complaint naming the proper party defendant(s) for his Section 1983 claim by August 17, 2015, or that claim will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan.(bwn)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JOHNATHAN EHREN EMILIEN CIVIL ACTION VERSUS No. 15-359 PARISH OF JEFFERSON, ET AL. SECTION: “E”(5) ORDER The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and the objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion herein, with one exception. The Court will allow Plaintiff to file an amended complaint naming the proper party defendant(s) for his Section 1983 claim.1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint, insofar as it can be construed as a request for habeas corpus relief, is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust available state court remedies. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff file an amended complaint naming the proper party defendant(s) for his Section 1983 claim by August 17, 2015, or that claim will be dismissed with prejudice. 1 See Basrowx v. Scott, 136 F.3d 1053, 1054 (5th Cir. 1998) (per curiam). New Orleans, Louisiana, this 27th day of July, 2015. HONORABLE SUSIE MORGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?