Keil v. Hanson

Filing 31

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 25 and SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 29 ; ORDERED that Curtis Antione Keil's 27 Motion to Supplement Objections is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Keil's 26 Motion to Object and Tim e Extension is construed in part as objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and those objections as supplemented are OVERRULED. FURTHER ORDERED that Keil's 26 Motion to Object and Time Extension is construed in part as a motion for a stay of these proceedings and that motion as supplemented is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Keil's petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state court remedies. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 9/10/2015.(blg)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
CURTIS ANTIONE KEIL

CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS

NO. 15-0422

RAY HANSON

SECTION “I”(4)

ORDER
The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and
Recommendation and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge, and considering the petitioner’s objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation, and the petitioner's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Supplemental Report and
Recommendation, which are hereby OVERRULED, approves the Report and Recommendation and
the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts
both as its opinion in this matter. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that Curtis Antione Keil’s “Motion to Supplement Objections” (Rec. Doc.
No. 27) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Keil’s “Motion to Object and Time Extension” (Rec.
Doc. No. 26) is construed in part as objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Rec. Doc. No. 25) and those objections as supplemented are OVERRULED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Keil’s “Motion to Object and Time Extension” (Rec.
Doc. No. 26) is construed in part as a motion for a stay of these proceedings and that motion as
supplemented is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Keil’s petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus
filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust
state court remedies.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 10th day of September, 2015.

____________________________________
LANCE M. AFRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2