Matthews v. Cain

Filing 39

ORDER ADOPTING 38 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS ORDERED that Patrick Matthews' federal application for habeas corpus relief is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Matthews' excessive sentence claim is GRANTE D and IT IS ORDERED that he be released from confinement unless the state court resentences him to a constitutional sentence in accordance with this Court's opinion within one hundred twenty (120) days. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Matthews' federal application is DENIED in all other respects. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 8/29/2018.(mmv)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA PATRICK MATTHEWS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 15-430 BURL CAIN, WARDEN SECTION: “G”(1) ORDER The Court, having considered the petition, the record, the applicable law and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of any party to file any objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its own opinion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Patrick Matthews’ federal application for habeas corpus relief is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Matthews’ excessive sentence claim is GRANTED and IT IS ORDERED that he be released from confinement unless the state court resentences him to a constitutional sentence in accordance with this Court’s opinion within one hundred twenty (120) days. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Matthews’ federal application is DENIED in all other respects. NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this _____ day of August, 2018. 29th __________________________________________ NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?