Armstrong v. Serpas et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 22 . Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey.(jrc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA EDDIE F. ARMSTRONG CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 15-808 RONAL SERPAS, ET AL. SECTION "A" (3) ORDER The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Plaintiff's suggests that prescription should not have run while he continued to receive treatment for his injuries. To the contrary, whether under state or federal law, the statute of limitations is not held in abeyance until the plaintiff becomes "harmed enough." See Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 387, 391 (2007). IT IS ORDERED that Lester C. Marshall's Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 16) is GRANTED and that the claims against that defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the claims against Ronal Serpas be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยงยง 1915A(b) and 1915(e)(2)(B). August 26, 2015 ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?