Gray v. Raymond
ORDER AND REASONS ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 28 . Accordingly: (1) the previously imposed stay is LIFTED; (2) plaintiff's motion to amend is denied; and (3) plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to their being asserted again until the Heck conditions are met. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 4/19/2017.(cg)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
BRANDON PERCELL GRAY, SR.
TED RAYMOND, ET AL.
SECTION “R” (2)
ORDER AND REASONS
Plaintiff Brandon Percell Gray, Sr. filed this pro se and in forma
pauperis civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has reviewed
de novo plaintiff’s complaint 1 and supplement,2 plaintiff’s letter to the
Recommendation,4 and plaintiff’s objection. 5 The Magistrate Judge’s Report
is correct, and plaintiff offers no meaningful new argument in his objection.
The Court therefore approves the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion.
R. Doc. 1.
R. Doc. 11.
R. Doc. 27.
R. Doc. 28.
R. Doc. 29.
Accordingly: (1) the previously imposed stay is LIFTED; (2) plaintiff’s
motion to amend is denied; and (3) plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE to their being asserted again until the Heck conditions are met.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this _____ day of April, 2017.
SARAH S. VANCE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?