Price v. Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 26

ORDER AND REASONS denying 25 Motion to Continue Spears Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 2/17/2016. (lag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SAMMY STEVEN PRICE CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 15-5461 ORLEANS PARISH SHERIFF’S OFFICE, SHERIFF MARLIN GUSMAN, NIOMI JONES “CITY ATTORNEY,” MUNICIPAL COURT SEC. C, T.D.C. ACTING WARDEN CAPT. WASHINGTON, CAPT. RHODES, SERG. TAHO SECTION “H” (4) ORDER AND REASONS The plaintiff, Sammy Steven Price, has filed a Motion to Reschedule a Spears Hearing (Rec. Doc. No. 25), in which he requests that the Court reset the Spears Hearing scheduled for January 7, 2016, which was later cancelled. Price alleges that he was released from prison and now is residing in a rehabilitation facility in Opelousas, Louisiana. He asserts that he is now in a better position to prosecute this civil action.1 Price has not sought to amend or supplement his complaint since he has been released from prison. Price filed the captioned pro se and in forma pauperis complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 while he was a prisoner incarcerated in the Orleans Parish Prison System.2 Under the regular screening of the case, the Court initially scheduled a hearing pursuant to Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985) for January 7, 2016.3 Upon learning that Price had been released from prison, the Court cancelled the Spears Hearing.4 1 Price also requested that he be provided with a copy of his original complaint. The Pro Se Unit in the Clerk of Court’s Office has provided Price with a copy of that pleading. 2 Rec. Doc. No. 8. 3 Rec. Doc. No. 9. 4 Rec. Doc. No. 20. The Spears Hearing was promulgated by the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for the purpose of allowing a prisoner-plaintiff the opportunity to further explain his factual allegations and for the Court to ascertain the legal basis for the claims asserted. Spears, 766 F.2d at 181-82. The information received at the hearing is considered to be in the nature of an amended complaint or a more definite statement under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) to assist the Court in conducting its review of the prisoner complaint for frivolousness. Id.; see also, Wilson v. Barrientos, 926 F.2d 480, 482 (5th Cir. 1991). The Spears Hearing procedure was encouraged by the Fifth Circuit as a “tool in our judicial workshop” to sift through the “mountains” of prisoner-filed suits in an effort to separate the frivolous from the potentially meritorious complaints. Spears, 766 F.2d at 182. The Spears Hearing practice was directed to suits being prosecuted by prisoners. Id. Price is no longer a prisoner subject to the limited resources and confines of a jail facility. As such, this civil action can proceed through the normal course of review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, § 1915A, 42 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as applicable. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Price’s Motion to Reschedule a Spears Hearing (Rec. Doc. No. 25) is DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana this 17th day of February, 2016. __________________________________________ KAREN WELLS ROBY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?