Sinceno v. Vannoy et al

Filing 24

ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's objections are OVERRULED as supported by the facts and law; the Magistrate Judge's 22 Report and Recommendation, including reasons therein, are ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court; and the instant 2254 petition for habeas relief is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 9/5/2017.(jls)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA WARREN SINCENO CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 16-6895 DARRYL VANNOY, Warden SECTION "B”(3) ORDER AND REASONS Petitioner Warren Sinceno seeks habeas corpus relief under Title 28 United States Code Section 2254. After the matter was automatically referred to United States Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Knowles under Local Rule 73, he issued a Report and Recommendation to dismiss Petitioner the petition. raised four (Rec. Doc. objections 22 to at 1). that In response, Report and Recommendation. (Rec. Doc. 23 at 1). After reviewing the record, applicable law, and for reasons summarized below, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED as supported by the facts and law; 2. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, including reasons therein, are ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court; and 3. The instant § 2254 petition for habeas relief is DISMISSED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 5th day of September, 2017. ___________________________________ SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDG 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?