Sinceno v. Vannoy et al
Filing
24
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's objections are OVERRULED as supported by the facts and law; the Magistrate Judge's 22 Report and Recommendation, including reasons therein, are ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court; and the instant 2254 petition for habeas relief is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 9/5/2017.(jls)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
WARREN SINCENO
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 16-6895
DARRYL VANNOY, Warden
SECTION "B”(3)
ORDER AND REASONS
Petitioner Warren Sinceno seeks habeas corpus relief under
Title 28 United States Code Section 2254. After the matter was
automatically referred to United States Magistrate Judge Daniel E.
Knowles under Local Rule 73, he issued a Report and Recommendation
to
dismiss
Petitioner
the
petition.
raised
four
(Rec.
Doc.
objections
22
to
at
1).
that
In
response,
Report
and
Recommendation. (Rec. Doc. 23 at 1). After reviewing the record,
applicable law, and for reasons summarized below,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED as supported by the
facts and law;
2. The
Magistrate
Judge’s
Report
and
Recommendation,
including reasons therein, are ADOPTED as the opinion of
the Court; and
3. The instant § 2254 petition for habeas relief is DISMISSED.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 5th day of September, 2017.
___________________________________
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDG
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?