Sinceno v. Vannoy et al
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's objections are OVERRULED as supported by the facts and law; the Magistrate Judge's 22 Report and Recommendation, including reasons therein, are ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court; and the instant 2254 petition for habeas relief is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 9/5/2017.(jls)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
DARRYL VANNOY, Warden
ORDER AND REASONS
Petitioner Warren Sinceno seeks habeas corpus relief under
Title 28 United States Code Section 2254. After the matter was
automatically referred to United States Magistrate Judge Daniel E.
Knowles under Local Rule 73, he issued a Report and Recommendation
Recommendation. (Rec. Doc. 23 at 1). After reviewing the record,
applicable law, and for reasons summarized below,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED as supported by the
facts and law;
including reasons therein, are ADOPTED as the opinion of
the Court; and
3. The instant § 2254 petition for habeas relief is DISMISSED.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 5th day of September, 2017.
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?