Sinceno v. Vannoy et al

Filing 24

ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's objections are OVERRULED as supported by the facts and law; the Magistrate Judge's 22 Report and Recommendation, including reasons therein, are ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court; and the instant 2254 petition for habeas relief is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 9/5/2017.(jls)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
WARREN SINCENO

CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS

NO. 16-6895

DARRYL VANNOY, Warden

SECTION "B”(3)
ORDER AND REASONS

Petitioner Warren Sinceno seeks habeas corpus relief under
Title 28 United States Code Section 2254. After the matter was
automatically referred to United States Magistrate Judge Daniel E.
Knowles under Local Rule 73, he issued a Report and Recommendation
to

dismiss

Petitioner

the

petition.

raised

four

(Rec.

Doc.

objections

22
to

at

1).
that

In

response,

Report

and

Recommendation. (Rec. Doc. 23 at 1). After reviewing the record,
applicable law, and for reasons summarized below,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED as supported by the
facts and law;
2. The

Magistrate

Judge’s

Report

and

Recommendation,

including reasons therein, are ADOPTED as the opinion of
the Court; and
3. The instant § 2254 petition for habeas relief is DISMISSED.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 5th day of September, 2017.

___________________________________
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDG
1