Donahue et al v. Republic National Distributing Company, LLC et al
Filing
125
ORDER and REASONS - Presently under submission in this matter are two motions for summary judgment 61 and 66 . IT IS ORDERED that U.S. Fire's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART (relative to contractual indemnity) and DENIED WIT HOUT PREJUDICE IN PART (relative to additional insured status). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Republic's motion for summary judgment 66 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, as stated within document. Signed by Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 5/18/2018. (cbs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
JOSHUA DONAHUE and ANGELA BOLTON
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 16-13948
REPUBLIC NATIONAL DISTRIBUTING
COMPANY, LLC and DARANA HYBRID, INC.
SECTION "N" (1)
ORDER AND REASONS
Presently under submission in this matter are two motions for summary judgment
(Rec. Docs. 61 and 66). The motion filed by Third-Party Defendant United States Fire Insurance
Company ("U.S. Fire") first seeks a determination that Republic National Distributing Company
("Republic") is not entitled to contractual indemnity from U.S. Fire pursuant to the contract ("Project
Agreement") (Rec. Doc. 66-3) entered into by Republic and Defendant W&H Systems, Inc.
("W&H). See Rec. Doc. 61-1, p.1). Considering that Republic's memoranda do not oppose this
aspect of U.S. Fire's motion, which further appears to have merit, IT IS ORDERED that U.S. Fire's
motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART, i.e. with respect to "contractual
indemnity."
The remainder of U.S. Fire's motion and the entirety of Republic's motion both
address the disputed applicability of Endorsement 101.0.1206 01 11 at ¶15, " Additional Insureds
By Written Contract" to the commercial general liability insurance policy U.S. Fire issued to W&H.
It states:
15. Additional Insureds By Written Contract
Section II – Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an
additional insured, any person or organization whom you are required
to add as an additional insured to this policy by written contract or
written agreement that is:
a. Currently in effect or becoming effective during the term of this
policy; and
b. Executed prior to the “bodily injury”, “property damage” or
“personal and advertising injury”.
1. The insurance provided to the additional insured applies as
follows:
(a) That person or organization is only an additional insured
with respect to liability for “bodily injury”, “property
damage” or “personal and advertising injury” caused by your
negligent acts or omissions at or from:
(i) Premises you own, rent, lease or occupy; or
(ii) Your ongoing operations performed for the
additional insured at the jobsite indicated by the
written contract or written agreement.
See Rec. Doc. 66-4 at p. 9 of 34 (emphasis added).
Having carefully considered the parties' submissions, applicable law, and the
remainder of the record in this matter, the Court is not sufficiently convinced that this additional
insured provision – particularly in light of the italicized language – is unambiguous. Nevertheless,
given the posture of this matter, the Court finds this issue more appropriately considered, if
necessary, after (or, if so ordered, in connection with) the separate motions for summary judgment
filed by the same parties, regarding Endorsement CG 20 10 04 13, which presently are set to be
taken under submission (by another section of this Court) on May 23, 2018. See Rec. Docs. 100 and
104. Endorsement CG 20 10 04 13 states, in pertinent part:
2
Additional Insured – Owners, Lessees, and Contractors –
Scheduled Person or Organization
This Endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
A. Section II – Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an
additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the
Schedule, but only with respect to liability for “bodily injury,”
“property damage” or “personal and advertising injury” caused, in
whole or in part, by:
1. Your acts or omissions; or
2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf;
in the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional
insured(s) at the location(s) designated above.
See Rec. Doc. 66-4, p. 15 of 34.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, IT IS ORDERED that U.S. Fire's
motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART (relative to contractual indemnity) and
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART (relative to additional insured status). IT IS
FURTHER ORDERED that Republic's motion for summary judgment (Rec. Doc. 66) is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 18th day of May 2018.
___________________________________
KURT D. ENGELHARDT
UNITED STATES JUDGE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?