MC Bank & Trust Company v. Suard Barge Service, Inc. et al
JUDGMENT under Rule 54(b) against Louis O'Neil Suard Jr. Plaintiff's claims against Suard Barge Service, Inc., Premier Services, Inc. and the vessels named as defendants in this matter are reserved and preserved. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 9/11/2017.(tm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
M C BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
SUARD BARGE SERVICE, INC.,
SECTION “R” (2)
Considering the Court’s order and reasons on file herein,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that there be a
judgment in favor of plaintiff against Defendant Louis O’Neil Suard, Jr. in
the amount of $3,006,077.03 in principal, $789,468.17 in accrued interest,
$3,507.30 in reimbursement for life insurance premiums, $8,500.00 for
vessel survey costs, and interest in the sum of $535.33 per day from August
Plaintiff is also entitled to costs, expenses and reasonable
attorneys’ fees in an amount to be determined by the Court at a later date.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there be a judgment in favor of
plaintiff against Louis O’Neil Suard, Jr. recognizing plaintiff as the holder of
a valid and enforceable commercial security agreement dated December 20,
2001, under which plaintiff was granted a security interest in a certain 28-
foot pleasure boat named Awesome and bearing Louisiana Wildlife and
Fisheries registration number LA-1345-EX and decal number 087039-04.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, because there is no just reason for
delay, this judgment constitutes a final judgment against Louis O’Neil Suard
Jr. under Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff’s
claims against Suard Barge Service, Inc., Premier Services, Inc. and the
vessels named as defendants in this matter are reserved and preserved.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 11th day of September, 2017.
SARAH S. VANCE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?