Rodgers v. Jefferson City et al

Filing 18

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Gary Daniel Rodgers's complaint asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, either as legally frivolous, for seeking monetary relief against immune defendants, or for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) or otherwise as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Signed by Judge Lance M Africk.(bwn)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA GARY DANIEL RODGERS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 16-14922 THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, ET AL. SECTION “I”(2) ORDER The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the objection by plaintiff, Gary Daniel Rodgers, which is hereby OVERRULED, approves the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Gary Daniel Rodgers’s complaint asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, either as legally frivolous, for seeking monetary relief against immune defendants, or for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) or otherwise as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). New Orleans, Louisiana, this 6th day of January, 2017. _________________________________ LANCE M. AFRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?