Crump v. Social Security Administration
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. ORDERED that Plaintiff Lorraine Crumps 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Social Security Administration's 19 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 10/6/2017.(clc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
LORRAINE MARIE CRUMP,
Plaintiff
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 16-14930
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant
SECTION: “E”
ORDER
Before the Court are Plaintiff Lorraine Crump’s 1 and Defendant Social Security
Administration’s 2 cross-motions for summary judgment. This matter was referred to the
United States Magistrate Judge, who issued his Report and Recommendation on
September 21, 2017. 3 The period for objections ended on October 5, 2017, with no
objections having been filed. The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the
applicable law, and the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation finds the
magistrate judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are correct and hereby approves
the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its
opinion in this matter. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Lorraine Crump’s motion for summary judgment 4
is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Social Security Administration’s
motion for summary judgment 5 is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed with prejudice.
New Orleans, Louisiana, on this 6th day of October 2017.
___________________ _______
SUSIE MORGAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
R. Doc. 17.
R. Doc. 19.
3 R. Doc. 23.
4 R. Doc. 17.
5 R. Doc. 19
1
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?