Fitch v. Lassus

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS ORDERED that Eric Micheal Fitch's 1983 claims for wrongful arrest by the defendant, Deputy Sheriff Daniel Lassus are STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED for statistical purposes until such time as Fitch's state criminal charges have ended. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff move to reopen the matter within thirty (30) days following resolution of his state felony criminal charges, including any direct appeal or immediate supervisory review, and include notification to the Court in writing whether Fitch was convicted or acquitted. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 4/3/2017.(mmv)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERIC MICHEAL FITCH CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 16-16903 DANIEL LASSUS SECTION: “B” (4) ORDER The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of any party to file an objection to the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. IT IS ORDERED that Eric Micheal Fitch’s § 1983 claims for wrongful arrest by the defendant, Deputy Sheriff Daniel Lassus are STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED for statistical purposes until such time as Fitch’s state criminal charges have ended. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff move to reopen the matter within thirty (30) days following resolution of his state felony criminal charges, including any direct appeal or immediate supervisory review, and include notification to the Court in writing whether Fitch was convicted or acquitted. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 3rd day of April, 2017. _________________________________________ SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?