Evans v. Social Security Administration
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 16 ) is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 17 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is hereby awarded Social Security disability benefits based on a disability onset date of July 1, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is hereby REMANDED to the Administrative Law Judge solely for a calculation of benefits based on a disability onset date of July 1, 2009. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 3/9/2018.(cg)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
SHANTEL EVANS
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
No. 17-376
NANCY A. BERRRYHILL, ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
SECTION: “J”(5)
ORDER
Having considered the record, the applicable law, the Report
and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Rec.
Doc. 18), the Parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (Rec.
Docs. 16, 17), and the failure of any party to file an objection
to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court
hereby APPROVES the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge and ADOPTS it as its opinion herein.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (Rec. Doc. 17) is DENIED.
It IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (Rec. Doc. 16) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is hereby awarded Social
Security disability benefits based on a disability onset date of
July 1, 2009.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is
hereby REMANDED to the Administrative Law Judge solely for a
calculation of benefits based on a disability onset date of July
1, 2009.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 9th day of March, 2018.
CARL J. BARBIER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?