Pierre et al v. T&K Express, Inc. et al
ORDER and REASONS denying 36 Motion to Determine Conflict-Free Representation and 46 Motion for Leave to File Plaintiffs' Cross Claim, as stated within document. Signed by Chief Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt on 10/27/2017. (cbs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
GWENDOLYN PIERRE, ET AL
T&K EXPRESS, INC., ET AL
SECTION “N” (1)
ORDER AND REASONS
Presently before the Court is: (1) Defendants T&K Express Inc. and Melvin Ruch’s Motion
to Determine Conflict-Free Representation (Rec. Doc. 36); and (2) Plaintiffs Anietra Pierre, Felicia
Pierre, and Percy Ross’ Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File Plaintiffs’ Cross Claim (Rec. Doc. 46).
Having carefully considered the parties’ submissions, the record, and the applicable law, IT IS
ORDERED that the motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Defendants’ Motion to Determine Conflict-Free Representation, which is not opposed by
Plaintiffs, apprises the Court of a conflict of interest of Plaintiffs’ counsel that appears to be
legitimate. Thus, allowing Plaintiffs to file a cross claim is improper until the conflict is resolved.
Moreover, since the Court denies the request to file a cross claim, the Motion to Determine
Conflict-Free Representation is properly denied without prejudice, as a conflict of interest exists
only if the Court were to allow Plaintiffs to file the cross claim at this time.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 27th day of October 2017.
KURT D. ENGELHARDT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?