Dukes v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
Filing
63
ORDER AND REASONS: granting 61 Motion for Summary Judgment, as stated herein. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 11/18/2022. (am)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MARSHALL DUKES,
Plaintiff
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 17-3159
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION
INC., ET AL.,
Defendants
SECTION: “E” (2)
ORDER AND REASONS
Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by BP Exploration &
Production Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c., Halliburton Energy Services,
Inc., Transocean Holdings, LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and Transocean Offshore
Deepwater Drilling, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”)1 against Marshall Dukes (“Plaintiff”).
The motion was filed on October 11, 2022.2 Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion was due
on October 18, 2022.3 As of the date of this Order and Reasons, no opposition to the
instant motion has been filed, and Plaintiff has not moved for an extension of his deadline
to file an opposition brief. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is, therefore,
unopposed. Although this dispositive motion is unopposed, summary judgment is not
automatic, and the Court must determine whether Defendants have shown they are
entitled to judgment as a matter of law.4
Defendants’ instant motion is nearly identical to the one filed by Defendants, and
1 R. Doc. 61. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Transocean Holdings, LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and
Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. joined in the motion for summary judgment filed by BP
Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, and BP p.l.c. Id. at p. 1 n.1.
2 Id.
3 R. Doc. 61-4.
4 See, e.g., Johnson v. Pettiford, 442 F.3d 917, 918 (5th Cir. 2006); FED. R. CIV. P. 56(a).
1
granted by this Court, in other B3 cases.5
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Orders & Reasons issued in the cited B3
cases;
IT IS ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment6 is GRANTED.
Judgment is granted in favor of Defendants BP Exploration & Production Inc., BP
America Production Company, BP p.l.c., Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Transocean
Holdings LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and Transocean Offshore Deepwater
Drilling, Inc. and against Plaintiff Marshall Dukes on all claims.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 18th day of November, 2022.
_______________ _______ ________
SUSIE MORGAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5 See Davis v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al., Civ. A. 17-3141 at R. Doc. 48 (E.D. La. 7/5/22)
(Morgan, J.).; see also Brown v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al., Civ. A. 17-3101 at R. Doc. 59
(E.D. La. 11/18/22) (Morgan, J.).
6 R. Doc. 61.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?