Hall v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al

Filing 49

ORDER & REASONS: ORDERED that Hall's 48 motion to disqualify is DENIED. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 7/14/2022. (clc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LORINZO BERNARD HALL CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 17-3261 BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC., et al. SECTION M (5) ORDER & REASONS Before the Court is a motion by plaintiff Lorinzo Bernard Hall to disqualify the undersigned from these proceedings.1 The same motion has been filed and fully briefed in seven other B3 cases. Having considered the parties’ memoranda, the record, and the applicable law, the Court denies the motion for the reasons articulated at length in the Order & Reasons issued in Carpenter v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., No. 17-3645, R. Doc. 63 (E.D. La. July 14, 2022), because there is no actual conflict of interest or appearance of impropriety, and the motion was untimely filed. A judge has an affirmative duty not to disqualify himself or herself unnecessarily, and because Hall raises no compelling or persuasive grounds for disqualification here, it is unnecessary and, indeed, would be improper for the undersigned to do so. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Hall’s motion to disqualify (R. Doc. 48) is DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 14th day of July, 2022. ________________________________ BARRY W. ASHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 R. Doc. 48.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?