Sellers v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
Filing
59
ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that the 45 motion in limine is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 47 spoliation motion is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 46 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Judgment is granted in favor of D efendants BP Exploration & Production, BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c., Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc., and against Plaintiff on all claims. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 05/25/2023. (js)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
TERRANCE L. SELLERS,
Plaintiff
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 17-3610
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION
INC., ET AL.,
Defendants
SECTION: “E” (4)
ORDER AND REASONS
Before the Court is a motion in limine to exclude the opinions of Terrance L.
Sellers’ (“Plaintiff”) general causation expert, Dr. Jerald Cook (“Cook”), filed by BP
Exploration & Production, BP America Production Company, and BP p.l.c. (collectively
“Defendants”).1 Also before the Court is the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.2
Plaintiff has filed oppositions to both motions, and Defendants have filed replies. Plaintiff
separately filed a spoliation motion,3 which Defendants oppose. The Court is prepared to
rule on pending motions herein.
Defendant’s motion in limine and motion for summary judgment are nearly
identical to the ones filed by Defendants, and granted by this Court, in other B3 cases.4
Likewise, Plaintiff’s spoliation motion is nearly identical to the ones filed by other B3
Plaintiffs, and denied by this Court, in other B3 cases.5
R. Doc. 45. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and
Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc., additional Defendants, join in the motion in limine.
2 R. Doc. 46. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and
Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc., additional Defendants, join in the motion for summary
judgment.
3 R. Doc. 47.
4 See Bruton v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et al., Civ. A. 17-3110 at R. Doc. 107 (E.D. La.
11/30/2022) (Morgan, J.); Harrison v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc, et al., Civ. A. 17-4346 at R. Doc.
85 (7/1/2022) (Morgan, J.).
5 Bruton, Civ. A. 17-3110 at R. Doc. 107.
1
1
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Orders & Reasons issued in the cited B3
cases;
IT IS ORDERED that the motion in limine is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the spoliation motion is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment is
GRANTED. Judgment is granted in favor of Defendants BP Exploration & Production,
BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c., Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.,
Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and Transocean Offshore
Deepwater Drilling, Inc., and against Plaintiff on all claims.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 25th day of May, 2023.
______________________ _________
SUSIE MORGAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?