Ferguson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al

Filing 43

ORDER AND REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that the 42 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Judgment is granted in favor of Defendants BP Exploration & Production Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c., Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. and against Plaintiff Minnie Ferguson on all claims. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 2/23/2023. (pp)

Case 2:17-cv-04327-SM-DPC Document 43 Filed 02/23/23 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MINNIE FERGUSON,
Plaintiff

CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS

NO. 17-4327

BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION
INC., ET AL.,
Defendants

SECTION: “E” (2)

ORDER AND REASONS
Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by BP Exploration &
Production Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c., Halliburton Energy Services,
Inc., Transocean Holdings, LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and Transocean Offshore
Deepwater Drilling, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”)1 against Minnie Ferguson
(“Plaintiff”). The motion was filed on February 14, 2023.2 Plaintiff’s opposition to the
motion was due on February 21, 2023.3 As of the date of this Order and Reasons, no
opposition to the instant motion has been filed, and Plaintiff has not moved for an
extension of her deadline to file an opposition brief. Defendants’ motion for summary
judgment is, therefore, unopposed. Although this dispositive motion is unopposed,
summary judgment is not automatic, and the Court must determine whether Defendants
have shown they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.4
Defendants’ instant motion is nearly identical to the one filed by Defendants, and

1 R. Doc. 42. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Transocean Holdings, LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc.,
and Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. joined in the motion for summary judgment filed by BP
Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, and BP p.l.c. Id. at p. 1 n.1.
2 Id.
3 R. Doc. 42-4.
4 See, e.g., Johnson v. Pettiford, 442 F.3d 917, 918 (5th Cir. 2006); FED. R. CIV. P. 56(a).

1

Case 2:17-cv-04327-SM-DPC Document 43 Filed 02/23/23 Page 2 of 2

granted by this Court, in other B3 cases.5
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Orders & Reasons issued in the cited B3
cases;
IT IS ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment6 is GRANTED.
Judgment is granted in favor of Defendants BP Exploration & Production Inc., BP
America Production Company, BP p.l.c., Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Transocean
Holdings LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and Transocean Offshore Deepwater
Drilling, Inc. and against Plaintiff Minnie Ferguson on all claims.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 23rd day February, 2023.
________________________________
SUSIE MORGAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

See Davis v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al., Civ. A. 17-3141 at R. Doc. 48 (E.D. La. 7/5/22)
(Morgan, J.); see also Brown v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al., Civ. A. 17-3101 at R. Doc. 59
(E.D. La. 11/18/22) (Morgan, J.).
6 R. Doc. 42.
5

2