Ashapura Proteins, Limited v. LK TRADING, L.L.C.

Filing 86

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS ORDERED that the 85 motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each sideto bear its own costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the terms of the 84 settlement agreement are incorporated as part of this Order, as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 8/9/2018. (jls)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ASHAPURA PROTEINS, LTD CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 17-4670 LK TRADING, LLC SECTION "B"(4) ORDER OF DISMISSAL Considering the jointly filed motion to dismiss (Rec. Doc. 85) and the settlement agreement (Rec. Doc. 84), IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the terms of the settlement agreement (Rec. Doc. 84) are incorporated as part of this Order. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 380-82 (1994); Hosp. House, Inc. v. Gilbert, 298 F.3d 424, 430-34 (5th Cir. 2002). The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement (Rec. Doc. 84) for a reasonable period of time, which by the terms of the settlement agreement should not exceed six (6) months. See Rec. Doc. 85 at 1; Kokkonen, 511 U.S. at 380-82; Hosp. House, 298 F.3d at 430-34. By incorporating the settlement agreement (Rec. Doc. 84) as part of this Order, a breach 1 of the settlement agreement would violate this Order. See Kokkonen, 511 U.S. at 380-82; Hosp. House, 298 F.3d at 431. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 9th day of August, 2018. ___________________________________ SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?