Ashapura Proteins, Limited v. LK TRADING, L.L.C.
Filing
86
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS ORDERED that the 85 motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each sideto bear its own costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the terms of the 84 settlement agreement are incorporated as part of this Order, as set forth in document. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 8/9/2018. (jls)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ASHAPURA PROTEINS, LTD
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 17-4670
LK TRADING, LLC
SECTION "B"(4)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Considering the jointly filed motion to dismiss (Rec. Doc.
85) and the settlement agreement (Rec. Doc. 84),
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s
claims against Defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side
to bear its own costs.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
that the terms of the settlement
agreement (Rec. Doc. 84) are incorporated as part of this Order.
See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 380-82
(1994); Hosp. House, Inc. v. Gilbert, 298 F.3d 424, 430-34 (5th
Cir.
2002).
The
Court
retains
jurisdiction
to
enforce
the
settlement agreement (Rec. Doc. 84) for a reasonable period of
time, which by the terms of the settlement agreement should not
exceed six (6) months. See Rec. Doc. 85 at 1; Kokkonen, 511 U.S.
at 380-82; Hosp. House, 298 F.3d at 430-34. By incorporating the
settlement agreement (Rec. Doc. 84) as part of this Order, a breach
1
of the settlement agreement would violate this Order. See Kokkonen,
511 U.S. at 380-82; Hosp. House, 298 F.3d at 431.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 9th day of August, 2018.
___________________________________
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?