Richardson v. Tubb et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against Scott Tubb are dismissed with prejudice to their being asserted again until the Heck conditions are met. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs cl aims against Judge Kim Jones are dismissed with prejudice as frivolous, for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted,and/or for seeking monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Signed by Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 8/25/2017.(mmv)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CELESTAN RICHARDSON CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 17-4963 SCOTT TUBB – OFFICE OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ET AL. SECTION: “G”(3) ORDER The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of any party to file an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against Scott Tubb are dismissed with prejudice to their being asserted again until the Heck conditions are met. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against Judge Kim Jones are dismissed with prejudice as frivolous, for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted, and/or for seeking monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 25th NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this _____ day of August, 2017. __________________________________________ NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?