Richardson v. Tubb et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against Scott Tubb are dismissed with prejudice to their being asserted again until the Heck conditions are met. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs cl aims against Judge Kim Jones are dismissed with prejudice as frivolous, for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted,and/or for seeking monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Signed by Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 8/25/2017.(mmv)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

CELESTAN RICHARDSON

CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS

NO. 17-4963

SCOTT TUBB – OFFICE OF
PROBATION AND PAROLE, ET AL.

SECTION: “G”(3)

ORDER
The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of any party to file an
objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter.
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against Scott Tubb are dismissed with
prejudice to their being asserted again until the Heck conditions are met.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against Judge Kim Jones are
dismissed with prejudice as frivolous, for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted,
and/or for seeking monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.

25th
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this _____ day of August, 2017.

__________________________________________
NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE