Wang v. Ochsner Medical Center - Kenner, L.L.C. et al
ORDER AND REASONS re 22 Request/Statement of Oral Argument, 26 Request/Statement of Oral Argument. ORDERED that the requests for oral argument are DENIED. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 8/17/2017.(clc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
YI-ZARN WANG, M.D.
OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER KENNER, L.L.C., ET AL.
ORDER AND REASONS
defendants on their motions to dismiss. 1
The requests are DENIED
for the following reasons.
It is the Court’s policy to grant oral argument on motions if
one of the following factors is present:
There is a need for an evidentiary hearing.
The motion or opposition papers involve a novel or
complex issue of law that is unsettled.
The motion or opposition papers argue for a change in
Dr. Boudreaux requests oral argument (Record Document 22) on his
motion to dismiss (Record Document 21), and the Ochsner entities
request oral argument (Record Document 26) on their motion to
dismiss (Record Document 25).
The motion or opposition papers implicate a
The case itself is of widespread community interest.
Because the defendants’ motions to dismiss do not involve any
of the above factors, IT IS ORDERED: that their requests for oral
argument on their motions are DENIED.
New Orleans, Louisiana, August 17th 2017
MARTIN L. C. FELDMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?