Wang v. Ochsner Medical Center - Kenner, L.L.C. et al

Filing 29

ORDER AND REASONS re 22 Request/Statement of Oral Argument, 26 Request/Statement of Oral Argument. ORDERED that the requests for oral argument are DENIED. Signed by Judge Martin L.C. Feldman on 8/17/2017.(clc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA YI-ZARN WANG, M.D. CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 17-5134 OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER KENNER, L.L.C., ET AL. SECTION "F" ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court are requests for defendants on their motions to dismiss. 1 oral argument by the The requests are DENIED for the following reasons. It is the Court’s policy to grant oral argument on motions if one of the following factors is present: 1. There is a need for an evidentiary hearing. 2. The motion or opposition papers involve a novel or complex issue of law that is unsettled. 3. The motion or opposition papers argue for a change in existing law. Dr. Boudreaux requests oral argument (Record Document 22) on his motion to dismiss (Record Document 21), and the Ochsner entities request oral argument (Record Document 26) on their motion to dismiss (Record Document 25). 1 1 4. The motion or opposition papers implicate a constitutional issue. 5. The case itself is of widespread community interest. Because the defendants’ motions to dismiss do not involve any of the above factors, IT IS ORDERED: that their requests for oral argument on their motions are DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana, August 17th 2017 __, ______________________________ MARTIN L. C. FELDMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?