Williams v. New Orleans Police Department

Filing 5

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 . The Court finds that the dismissal should be without prejudice. See Millan v. USAA Gen. Indem. Co., 546 F.3d 321, 326-27 (5th Cir. 2008); Berry v. CIGNA/RSI-CIGNA, 975 F.2d 1188, 1191 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, plaintiff's section 1983 complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 9/8/2017.(cg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ARMAND JUDE WILLIAMS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 17-5749 NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT SECTION “R” (2) ORDER Plaintiff Armand Jude Williams filed this pro se complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Having reviewed de novo the complaint, 1 the record, and the Magistrate Judge’s unopposed Findings and Recommendation, 2 the Court approves the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that plaintiff’s case should be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Court finds that the dismissal should be without prejudice. See Millan v. USAA Gen. Indem. Co., 546 F.3d 321, 326-27 (5th Cir. 2008); Berry v. CIGNA/RSI-CIGNA, 975 F.2d 1188, 1191 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, plaintiff’s section 1983 complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. New Orleans, Louisiana, this _____ day of September, 2017. 8th _____________________ SARAH S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 2 R. Doc. 1. R. Doc. 3.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?