Harold v. Rayburn Correctional Center et al

Filing 30

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 29 . Accordingly, plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c)(1). Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 2/1/2018.(cg)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
SANCHAZ DEMOND HAROLD

CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS

NO. 17-7811

RAYBURN CORRECTIONAL
CENTER, ET AL.

SECTION “R” (2)
ORDER

Plaintiff Sanchaz Demond Harold filed this pro se complaint under 42
U.S.C. § 1983.1 Having reviewed de novo the complaint, the record, the
applicable law, and the Magistrate Judge’s unopposed Report and
Recommendation,2 the Court hereby approves the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion herein. For the
reasons explained by the Magistrate Judge, plaintiff fails to allege a
constitutional violation and his complaint is without arguable merit.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c)(1).
1st
New Orleans, Louisiana, this _____ day of February, 2018.

_____________________
SARAH S. VANCE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
2

R. Doc. 1.
R. Doc. 29.