Folse v. Knight et al

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Doc. 18 . IT IS ORDERED that the 42 U.S.C. §1983 claims by Breiun Vicha Folse against Warden Cantrelle Davis and Sheriff Craig Webre are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Folse's § 1983 claims against Deputy Robert Knight for cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment shall remain referred to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon on 7/10/2018. (NEF: Mag. 4) (sa)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BREIUN VICHA FOLSE CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 17-9624 DY. ROBERT KNIGHT, WARDEN CANTRELLE DAVIS, SHERIFF CRAIG WEBRE SECTION “S”(4) ORDER The Court, having considered the record, the applicable law, the Partial Report and Recommendation of the Chief United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of the plaintiff to file an objection to the Chief Magistrate Judge’s Partial Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Partial Report and Recommendation of the Chief United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the 42 U.S.C. §1983 claims by Breiun Vicha Folse against Warden Cantrelle Davis and Sheriff Craig Webre are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e), §1915A and 42 U.S.C. §1997e. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Folse’s § 1983 claims against Deputy Robert Knight for cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment arising from the alleged sexual touching shall proceed and remain referred to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings. July 10th New Orleans, Louisiana, this ______ day of _____________________, 2018. ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CLERK TO NOTIFY CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN WELLS ROBY 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?