Allen v. Vannoy et al

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 19 . Michael Allen's petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed with prejudice as time-barred. Signed by Judge Greg Gerard Guidry on 11/17/2021.(ko)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MICHAEL ALLEN CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 19-14737 DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY SECTION “T”(4) ORDER The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the Chief United States Magistrate Judge, and the objection to the Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation filed by Michael Allen, hereby overrules the objection, approves the Report and Recommendation of the Chief United States Magistrate Judge, and adopts such as its opinion in this matter for the reasons assigned below. In his objection, Petitioner reiterates his assertions that the state court filed to timely provide notice of the judgment, which thereby precluded him from timely seeking further review, and that he is otherwise entitled to equitable tolling under post-AEDPA jurisprudence because he diligently attempted to check on the status of his petition in the state court. The Chief Magistrate Judge, however, thoroughly considered Petitioner’s assertions and concluded his federal filing was untimely pursuant to the AEDPA’s limitation period in § 2254 and he was not entitled to equitable tolling or any other exception to his untimely filing. This Court finds no error of fact or law in the Chief Magistrate Judge’s reasoning, and therefore overrules Petitioner’s objection. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Michael Allen’s petition for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time-barred. November New Orleans, Louisiana, this 17th day of _________________________, 2021. ____ ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?