Simon v. Larpenter

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, as set forth in document. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 4/26/2021.(jls)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANSEN MICHAEL SIMON CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 20-1854 SHERIFF JERRY LARPENTER, et al. SECTION: “G”(2) ORDER The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of any party to file an objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Sheriff Jerry Larpenter and Warden Stephen Bergeron are dismissed as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because Plaintiff has not alleged that either of these defendants was personally involved in any alleged constitutional violation or that they implemented an unconstitutional policy. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against unnamed inmate workers are dismissed as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because the inmate workers are not state actors who may be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Deputy Brody Fanguy and Officer Dontrell Steel are dismissed as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because Plaintiff has not alleged facts showing that deliberate indifference on the part of these defendants in failing to wear personal protective equipment or to wear such equipment properly. 26th NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA, this _____ day of April, 2021. _________________________________ NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?