Kimble v. Louisiana State et al
Filing
207
JUDGMENT under Rule 54(b): IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that there be judgment in favor of defendant Parish of Jefferson and against plaintiff Raymond Harold Kimble, III dismissing with prejudice Kimble's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claim Nos. Five through Ten where he seeks to hold Parish of Jefferson liable based on Monell v. Dept. of Social Servs. of City of New York, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), or other theories of municipal liability, for a prison design that denies him privacy, and for negligent repairs or damages for his slip and fall. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 8/1/2022.(cwa)
Case 2:21-cv-00409-JCZ-DPC Document 207 Filed 08/01/22 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
RAYMOND HAROLD KIMBLE, III
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NO. 21-409
PARISH OF JEFFERSON, ET AL.
SECTION “A”(2)
RULE 54(B) JUDGMENT
The Court having approved the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and
having adopted it as its opinion herein, and finding no just cause for delay; accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that there be judgment in favor of
defendant Parish of Jefferson and against plaintiff Raymond Harold Kimble, III dismissing with
prejudice Kimble’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claim Nos. Five through Ten where he seeks to hold Parish
of Jefferson liable based on Monell v. Dept. of Social Servs. of City of New York, 436 U.S. 658
(1978), or other theories of municipal liability, for a prison design that denies him privacy, and for
negligent repairs or damages for his slip and fall.
8/1/2022
__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?