Logiudice v. Nelson Coleman Correctional Center et al
Filing
17
ORDER AND REASONS - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's amended complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge Mary Ann Vial Lemmon on 1/10/2022.(sbs)
Case 2:21-cv-01148-MVL-DPC Document 17 Filed 01/10/22 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
NICOLO EVOLA LOGIUDICE, JR.
*
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
*
NO. 21-1148
NELSON COLEMAN CORRECTIONAL *
CENTER, ET AL.
SECTION “S” (2)
ORDER AND REASONS
Plaintiff filed the instant suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that three separate prison
facilities had medically treated him without his consent, and seeking $7,000,000,000 for pain and
suffering. On November 5, 2021, this court entered an order granting the plaintiff 21 days within
which to amend his complaint to specify the date of the alleged unauthorized treatment, to
identify a proper defendant, and to set forth sufficient factual allegations to support a claim under
42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Plaintiff timely filed an amended complaint that does not cure these defects. While the
amended complaint mentions Sheriff Greg Champagne, the only date mentioned in the amended
complaint is “on or around April 2009.” Plaintiff also asserts that he no longer believes this case
is a § 1983 case, but rather is “a liability suit.” He does not specify what alternative basis for
liability besides § 1983 upon which his claims are premised, what duty was owed him on that
basis, and how it was breached. Accordingly, as amended, the complaint fails to state a claim
upon which relief can be granted, and therefore,
Case 2:21-cv-01148-MVL-DPC Document 17 Filed 01/10/22 Page 2 of 2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s amended complaint is DISMISSED for
failure to state a claim.
10th
New Orleans, Louisiana, this _____ day of January, 2022.
________________________________________
MARY ANN VIAL LEMMON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?