Greenwald v. Cantrell, et al

Filing 169

ORDER AND REASONS denying 151 Motion for Settlement Conference. The motion is denied, as set forth herein. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo on 03/06/2025. (ko)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA KENDRA GREENWALD CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 22-2371 LATOYA CANTRELL ET AL. SECTION “H” ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Settlement Conference (Doc. 151). The full facts of this case have been outlined in prior orders. 1 Relevant here is merely that after a series of motions to dismiss, Plaintiff Kendra Greenwald’s claim for violation of her substantive due process rights survives. The State Defendants have filed an interlocutory appeal of this Court’s failure to dismiss Plaintiff’s substantive due process claim on Heck v. Humphrey or sovereign immunity grounds. 2 In light of the appeal, this Court stayed all discovery against the State Defendants. 3 In the instant Motion, Plaintiff seeks an order requiring the parties to attend an early settlement conference with the magistrate judge. Given the 1 Docs. 69, 138. 2 The “State Defendants” are Attorney General Liz Murrill; Deputy Superintendent of Louisiana State Police Chris Eskew; Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections James M. LeBlanc; Superintendent of Louisiana State Police Robert Hodges (collectively, the “State Defendants”). 3 Doc. 163. 1 stay of discovery and the pending issue of sovereign immunity, the Court finds that requiring the parties to attend a settlement conference would be premature and unproductive at this time. Accordingly; IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Settlement Conference is DENIED. New Orleans, Louisiana this 6th day of March, 2025. ____________________________________ JANE TRICHE MILAZZO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?