Griffin v. St. Charles Parish
ORDER AND REASONS ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against St. Charles Parish are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for his failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 11/15/2023.(cs)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
DONQUIEL WILLIAM GRIFFIN
ST. CHARLES PARISH
SECTION: D (4)
ORDER AND REASONS
The Court, having considered Plaintiff Donquiel William Griffin’s 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 Complaint,1 the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation
of the United States Magistrate Judge,2 and the failure of the Plaintiff to file any
objection to the Report and Recommendation,3 hereby approves and adopts the
Report and Recommendation as its opinion in this matter. In doing so, the Court
notes that it has construed Plaintiff Donquiel William Griffin’s pro se pleading
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against
St. Charles Parish are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(b) for his failure to prosecute.
New Orleans, Louisiana, November 15, 2023.
WENDY B. VITTER
United States District Judge
R. Doc. 3.
R. Doc. 7.
3 Objections were due November 1, 2023. Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court has allowed
additional time for objections. None have been filed as of the date of this Order.
4 See Coleman v. United States, 912 F.3d 824, 828 (5th Cir. 2019).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?