Griffin v. St. Charles Parish

Filing 8

ORDER AND REASONS ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against St. Charles Parish are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for his failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 11/15/2023.(cs)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DONQUIEL WILLIAM GRIFFIN CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 23-2479 ST. CHARLES PARISH SECTION: D (4) ORDER AND REASONS The Court, having considered Plaintiff Donquiel William Griffin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Complaint,1 the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge,2 and the failure of the Plaintiff to file any objection to the Report and Recommendation,3 hereby approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as its opinion in this matter. In doing so, the Court notes that it has construed Plaintiff Donquiel William Griffin’s pro se pleading liberally.4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against St. Charles Parish are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for his failure to prosecute. New Orleans, Louisiana, November 15, 2023. ______________________________ WENDY B. VITTER United States District Judge R. Doc. 3. R. Doc. 7. 3 Objections were due November 1, 2023. Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court has allowed additional time for objections. None have been filed as of the date of this Order. 4 See Coleman v. United States, 912 F.3d 824, 828 (5th Cir. 2019). 1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?