Shaw Constructors v. ICF Kaiser Engineers, et al

Filing 270

AMENDED JUDGMENT ON REMAND....Judgment is hereby rendered in favor of plaintiff Shaw Constructors, Inc., and against defendant PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P., in the amount of $1,779,612.47 with legal interest thereon from February 23, 1999 at the annual rates provided by Louisiana law until the date of the judgment entered on March 27, 2008 and thereafter as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 9/25/09. (LSM, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHAW CONSTRUCTORS, INC. VERSUS ICF KAISER ENGINEERS, INC., ET AL CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 99-254-SCR AMENDED JUDGMENT ON REMAND Judgment is hereby rendered in favor of plaintiff Shaw Constructors, Inc., and against defendant PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P., in the amount of $1,779,612.47 with legal interest thereon from February 23, 1999 at the annual rates provided by Louisiana law until the date of the judgment entered on March 27, 2008 and thereafter as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Judgment is further rendered in favor of Shaw Constructors, Inc. and against PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P. recognizing to the extent of the dollar amount of this judgment, Shaw's right to enforce its claim and privilege against PCS personally and against PCS's property, pursuant to Shaw's Amended and Supplemental Lien Affidavits and Statements of Claim and Privilege recorded on February 17, 1999 in Ascension Parish, Louisiana (Mortgage Book 824, page 299) and Iberville Parish, Louisiana (Mortgage Book 325, Entry 041). Costs allowed under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 shall be taxed by the Clerk of Court against defendant PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P. in accordance with the applicable provisions of Local Civil Rule 54. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, September 25, 2009. STEPHEN C. RIEDLINGER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?