Southern Capitol Ent, et al v. Conseco Services LLC, et al

Filing 46

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Considering the request in the 45 letter from counsel for defts, and after conferring with the district judge, the scheduling order is amended as follows: Expert discovery, including depositions of expert witnesses, shall be completed no later that the day before the parties are due to file the pretrial order. The dates for the final pretrial conference and the trial will be fixed by the district judge in due course. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 1/26/2010. (JDL, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SOUTHERN CAPITOL ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL VERSUS CONSECO SERVICES LLC CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 04-705-JJB-SCR AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER Considering the information and request in the January 13, 2009 letter from counsel for the defendants, record document number 45, and conferring with the district judge regarding the parties' request, the scheduling order previously issued is hereby amended as follows.1 3. Expert discovery, including depositions of expert witnesses, shall be completed no later than the day before the parties are due to file the pretrial order.2 The dates for the final pretrial conference and the trial will be fixed by the district judge in due course. The time limits set forth in this order shall not be modified except by leave of court upon a showing of good cause. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, January 26, 2010. STEPHEN C. RIEDLINGER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 New material is in bold type. The deadlines in items 1 and 2 have expired and need not be repeated. The date of the final pretrial conference will determine when the pretrial order must be filed and when the parties must complete their expert discovery. The date of the final pretrial conference will not be earlier than mid May 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?