Heck et al v. Buhler et al
Filing
254
ORDER granting 253 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Court's 11/20/2015 252 Order to Supplement. The deadline is extended to 12/21/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 12/4/2015. (LLH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
RAYMOND E. HECK, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NUMBER 07-21-BAJ-SCR
KENNETH K. BUHLER, ET AL.
RULING ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Before the court is the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of
Time to Submit Responses to This Court’s Ruling and Order of
November 20, 2015.
Record document number 253.
According to the
motion, defendant Wayne Triche does not consent to the relief
requested.
The Ruling and Order to which the motion refers does not
require any action by the plaintiffs or the defendant Triche.
Rather, it required the assigned magistrate judge to make factual
findings as to whether defendant Triche has offered to pay the full
amount he properly owes, including interest, in light of the
ruling, the prior judgment and the ruling on attorney’s fees.
So as to give the parties time to reassess their respective
positions after considering the Ruling and Order, to provide them
with an opportunity to resolve their differences amicably, and to
provide the court with their calculations of the amount owed if
they are unable to do so, an Order to Supplement was issued on
November 24, 2015. The last paragraph of the motion clarifies that
the plaintiffs seek additional time to comply with the Order to
Supplement.
Due to their attorney being ill, the plaintiffs seek
a 13-day extension of the December 8, 2015 date by which responses
to the Order to Supplement are due.
Considering the circumstances, the court finds good cause to
grant the requested extension.
Therefore;
IT IS ORDERED that the December 8, 2015 deadline set in the
Order to Supplement is extended to December 21, 2015.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, December 4, 2015.
STEPHEN C. RIEDLINGER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?