Croswell et al v. Motel Six Operating L.P. et al

Filing 34

RULING denying 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Motel 6, Inc., Motel Six Operating L.P., M-Six Penvest 1 Business Trust and 23 MOTION Exclude George M. Hammitt, Ph.D., P.E. filed by Motel 6, Inc., Motel Six Operating L.P., M-Six Penvest 1 Business Trust. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 7/22/09. (BP, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TED CROSWELL, ET AL VERSUS MOTEL SIX OPERATING L.P., ET AL CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 07-640-FJP-SCR RULING After reviewing the motion for summary judgment and memoranda submitted by the parties, the Court finds there are material issues of fact as to the defendants' negligence and the plaintiffs' comparative negligence. There are other issues such as the amount of lighting, the size and color of the speed bump, whether the plaintiffs should and could have used the paved walkway, and plaintiffs' negligence, if any, of walking on the side of the car and failure to watch where she was walking, and whether there was sufficient warning regarding the speed bump and whether such a warning was required.1 Recent jurisprudence also may affect the applicability of the ADA to this case.2 Because of numerous factual issues, the Court did not determine the expertise of any expert; thus, defendants' Motion to Exclude the report and testimony of George M. Hammitt, Ph.D., P.E. is denied as moot.3 The The Court has considered all of the contentions of the parties whether specifically discussed herein or not. The list of issues of fact does not contain all of the issues in dispute. See Frame v. City of Arlington, ___ F.3d ___ 2009 WL 1930045 (5 th Cir. July 7, 2009). 3 2 1 Rec. Doc. No. 23. Doc#46231 Court will permit either party to file a motion for a Daubert hearing which shall be filed and heard prior to the trial of this case to determine whether any offered expert may testify as an expert in this case. Therefore; Defendants' motion for summary judgment4 and motion to exclude5 are denied. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, July 22, 2009. S FRANK J. POLOZOLA MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 4 Rec. Doc. No. 22. Rec. Doc. No. 23. 5 Doc#46231 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?