Carroll v. Bank of Greensburg
Filing
12
RULING granting 11 MOTION to Compel Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 2/18/09. (BP, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
TANYA CARROLL VERSUS BANK OF GREENSBURG
CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 08-128-JJB-SCR
RULING ON MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY Before Discovery. filed. On November 11, 2008 the defendant served written discovery requests on the plaintiff Tanya Carroll. responding to the discovery expired the Before the period for plaintiff's attorney the court is the defendant's Motion to Compel
Record document number 11.
No opposition has been
withdrew from the case.1
Therefore, the defendant attempted to When no
serve the plaintiff directly with the discovery requests.
discover responses were received from the plaintiff, the defendant sent a certified letter to the plaintiff at the only viable address it had.2 According to the defendant's motion, the plaintiff did
not call for the discovery conference, and has not contacted the defendant or provided answers and documents in response to the discovery requests. Defendant's unsuccessful efforts to obtain the discovery without court action led to the filing of this motion to
1 2
Record document number 10. Defendant Exhibits B and C.
obtain the written discovery and an award of expenses incurred in bringing the motion. Plaintiff's failure to either answer or object to the
interrogatories and produce responsive documents demonstrates that under Rule 37(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., the defendant is entitled to an order compelling the plaintiff to respond to the discovery
requests.
Plaintiff must answer the interrogatories and produce
all responsive documents for inspection and copying within ten days. No objections will be allowed.3 Under Rule 37(a)(5)(A), if a motion to compel discovery is granted, the court shall, after affording an opportunity to be heard, require the party whose conduct necessitated the motion to pay to the moving party the reasonable expenses incurred in making the motion, unless the court finds that the motion was filed without the movant first making a good faith effort to obtain the discovery without court action, the party's nondisclosure, response or objection was substantially justified, or that other
circumstances make an award of expenses unjust. Plaintiff's failure to respond to the defendant's efforts to obtain discovery and to this motion, demonstrate that the defendant
Generally, discovery objections are waived if a party fails to timely object to interrogatories, production requests or other discovery efforts. See, In re U.S., 864 F.2d 1153, 1156 (5th Cir.), reh'g denied, 869 F.2d 1487 (5th Cir. 1989); Godsey v. U.S., 133 F.R.D. 111, 113 (S.D. Miss. 1990.) 2
3
is entitled to reasonable expenses under this rule.4
Defendant did
not submit anything to support a request for a specific amount of expenses. A review of the motion and memorandum supports the
conclusion that an award of $150.00 is reasonable. Accordingly, the defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery is granted. Plaintiff shall serve substantive answers to the
defendant's interrogatories, and produce for inspection and copying all documents responsive to the defendant's requests for production of documents, without objections, within ten days. Pursuant to
Rule 37(a)(5)(A), the plaintiff is also ordered to pay to the defendant, within ten days, reasonable expenses in the amount of $150.00. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, February 18, 2009.
STEPHEN C. RIEDLINGER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
These same facts show that the plaintiff's actions are not substantially justified and that there are no circumstances which would make an award of expenses unjust. 3
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?