Sandres v. State Of Louisiana Division Of Administration et al

Filing 117

RULING granting 116 Motion for Explanation of Meaning of Notations at Bottom of Rulings or Orders. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 5/18/2009. (JDL, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NAOMI SANDRES CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NUMBER 08-145-FJP-SCR STATE OF LOUISIANA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT RULING MOTION FOR EXPLANATION Before the court is the plaintiff's Motion for Explanation of Meaning of Notations at Bottom of Rulings or Orders Since September, 2008 and Explanation as to Why Document Response for 3 of Last Decisions Not Given as Ruling or Order But Scribble on Top Sheet of Motions Presented by Plaintiff by District Judge. document number 116. This motion is does not relate to any party's claims or defenses, and the information sought could have been requested during the status conference held May 14, 2009. The court may Record decide a motion by issuing a ruling, an order, an opinion, a memorandum opinion , findings of fact and conclusions of law, or even a simple docket entry. The title given to a decision varies with the type motion, the relief requested or granted, and the particular circumstances. Decisions on motions are usually typewritten, but simple decisions may also be handwritten on the first page of the motion, the last page of the motion, or on a proposed order submitted with the motion. The notations on the bottom of some minute entries, rulings and orders - in this case and other cases in this court - are to assist the clerk of court in complying with statistical reporting requirements. Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion is granted to the extend that the foregoing explanation has been provided. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, May 18, 2009. STEPHEN C. RIEDLINGER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?