Sandres v. State Of Louisiana Division Of Administration et al

Filing 145

RULING Adopting and Affirming the 8/25/2009 135 Ruling of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and the 9/3/2009 136 Decision of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 9/23/2009. (JDL, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NAOMI SANDRES CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NUMBER 08-145-FJP-SCR STATE OF LOUISIANA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION RULING The plaintiff, Naomi Sandres, has filed an appeal1 of the decision rendered by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on September 3, 2009,2 which denied the motion of plaintiff to compel subpoenaed records from MV Tech. After reviewing plaintiff's

appeal, the ruling of the magistrate judge, and the record in this case, the Court finds there is no need for the defendant to file an opposition to the appeal. For reasons set forth by the magistrate

judge, which are adopted herein as this Court's opinion, the August 25, 2009, ruling is hereby AFFIRMED. Plaintiff, Naomi Sandres, has also filed an appeal3 of the decision rendered by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on September 3, 2009,4 which denied the Motion of plaintiff for a 60-

1

Rec. Doc. No. 137.

2

Rec. Doc. No. 135. Rec. Doc. No. 138. Rec. Doc. No. 136.

3

4

Doc#46391

Day Extension of Discovery.

After reviewing plaintiff's appeal,

the ruling of the magistrate judge, and the record in this case, the Court finds there is no need for the defendant to file an opposition to the appeal. For reasons set forth by the magistrate

judge, which are adopted herein as this Court's opinion, the August 25, 2009, ruling is hereby AFFIRMED.5 Baton Rouge, Louisiana, September 23, 2009.

9 FRANK J. POLOZOLA

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Before issuing this ruling on the pending Magistrate Appeals, the Court also considered the opposition filed by the plaintiff, which is filed into the record as document number 139. Doc#46391 2

5