Poullard v. Jindal et al

Filing 8

RULING Affirming the 3 Ruling of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. FURTHER ORDERED that pltfs suit be dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk of Court shall not accept any further suits from the pltf unless pltf pays the $350.00 filing fee at the time the new suit is filed. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 4/29/2009. (JDL, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JOHN POULLARD (#98999) VERSUS BOBBY JINDAL, ET AL RULING In this appeal, plaintiff seeks review of the Magistrate judge's ruling of April 13, 2009, ordering the plaintiff to pay the Court's filing fee within 20 days of the date of the order, April 13, 2009.1 In reviewing the magistrate judge's ruling in question, court must decide whether the ruling constitutes clear error. U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). the 28 CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 09-214-FJP-SCR Having considered the Magistrate Judge's ruling on the issue in question, the court does not find any clear error. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the ruling of the Magistrate Judge dated April 13, 2009, is hereby AFFIRMED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's suit be dismissed without prejudice. Because of the number of frivolous cases the plaintiff has filed, which are set forth in footnote 1 of the Magistrate Judge's order, the Clerk of Court shall not accept any further suits from the plaintiff unless plaintiff pays the $350.00 1 Rec. Doc. No. 3. Doc#45997 Operations filing fee at the time the new suit is filed. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April 29, 2009. 9 FRANK J. POLOZOLA MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Doc#45997 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?