Cox v. Environmental Analytics, Inc. et al

Filing 98

JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED that a final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the defendant and against plaintiff, dismissing all claims against defendant, with prejudice, at plaintiffs costs. Costs allowed under 28 U.S.C. §1920 shall be taxed by the clerk of court in favor of defendant and against plaintiff in accordance with the provisions of LR 54.3M.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Docia L Dalby on 8/18/2010. (CMM, )

Download PDF
Cox v. Environmental Analytics, Inc. et al Doc. 98 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA WILLIAM TROY COX, SR. VERSUS NUMBER 09-237-DLD ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICS, INC. CIVIL ACTION JUDGMENT This matter came for trial by jury beginning August 10, 2010. Present in court were Jean-Paul Robert, Sr. and Joseph J. Long on behalf of plaintiff and Joseph P. Brantley, IV, Samuel Bradley Rhorer, and Julie J. Baxter on behalf of defendant. The case having been duly tried by a jury, and on the basis of the verdict returned by the jury on August 12, 2010 (rec. doc. 97); IT IS ORDERED that a final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the defendant and against plaintiff, dismissing all claims against defendant, with prejudice, at plaintiff's costs. Costs allowed under 28 U.S.C. §1920 shall be taxed by the clerk of court in favor of defendant and against plaintiff in accordance with the provisions of LR 54.3M. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on August 18, 2010. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DOCIA L. DALBY Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?