Lee v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al

Filing 16

ORDER: as to 15 Pltfs Objection to the 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION...IT IS ORDERED that any deft knowing a current residence, work or business address for Defts T. Etheridge and D. Haney provide it to the clerk of court, under seal, within 10 da ys so that defts may be served with process. FURTHER ORDERED that upon filing of the last known address of these defts, that these defts be served with a copy of the complaint...FURTHER ORDERED that the USM is to serve these defts wherever found. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 9/3/2009. (JDL, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

EDDIE D. LEE (#102226) VERSUS LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL ORDER Before the court is the plaintiff's Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation which shall be treated in part, as a motion to provide the last known addresses of defendants T. Etheridge and D. Haney. Record document number 15. CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 09-327-JJB-SCR

Therefore; IT IS ORDERED that any defendant knowing a current residence, work or business address for defendants T. Etheridge and D. Haney provide it to the clerk of court, under seal, defendants may be served with process. within 10 days so that these In the event no defendant has a

current address at which Etheridge and Haney may be served, it will be the plaintiff's responsibility to provide the clerk of court with an address at which these defendants may be served. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon the last known addresses of defendants T. Etheridge and D. Haney being filed with the court, these defendants be served with a copy of the complaint in accordance with law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal is to serve these defendants wherever found. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, September 3, 2009.

STEPHEN C. RIEDLINGER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE