McGrew v. Roudtree et al

Filing 171

RULING Adopting 149 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, rec.doc.no. 80, is granted in part, dismissing the plaintiffs claim of deliberate medical indifference asserted against de fendants Jonathan Roundtree, Aurielle Boeker, Mike Thomas and Anthony McCoy, and this matter is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings in connection with the plaintiffs claim of excessive force asserted against defendants Huey Pidgeon, Marks Allen, Joseph Russell and Greg Eirick. Signed by Chief Judge Ralph E. Tyson on 5/9/2011. (PJH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CARLOS A. MCGREW (#413135) CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 09-859-RET DR. JONATHAN ROUNDTREE, ET AL RULING The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Christine Noland dated March 9, 2011. Objections and responses thereto have been filed, which the court has considered. The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court’s opinion herein. Accordingly, the defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, rec.doc.no. 80, is granted in part, dismissing the plaintiff’s claim of deliberate medical indifference asserted against defendants Jonathan Roundtree, Aurielle Boeker, Mike Thomas and Anthony McCoy, and this matter is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings in connection with the plaintiff’s claim of excessive force asserted against defendants Huey Pidgeon, Marks Allen, Joseph Russell and Greg Eirick. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, May 9th , 2011. S RALPH E. TYSON, CHIEF JUDGE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?