Charpentier v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 18

RULING Adopting 17 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the final decision of Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, denying the plaintiff's application for suppl emental security income (SSI) benefits is reversed, and this matter will be remanded to the Commissioner to conduct any administrative proceedings necessary to complete the record, reevaluate the plain tiff's claim in accordance with the applicable legal standards and issue a new decision. Signed by Chief Judge Ralph E. Tyson on 06/06/2011. (NLT)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LYNETTE CHARPENTIER CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NUMBER 09-1034-RET MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION RULING The court, after carefully considering the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated March 11, 2011, to which no objection has been filed, hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court’s opinion herein. Accordingly, under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the final decision of Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, denying the plaintiff’s application for supplemental security income (SSI) benefits is reversed, and this matter will be remanded to the Commissioner to conduct any administrative proceedings necessary to complete the record, reevaluate the plaintiff’s claim in accordance with the applicable legal standards and issue a new decision. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, June 6 , 2011. S RALPH E. TYSON, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?