Standiford v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 21

RULING denying 4 Motion to Remand.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 8/19/2010. (CMM, )

Download PDF
Standiford v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Doc. 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALLYSON STANDIFORD VERSUS WAL-MART STORES, INC. CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 10-42-SCR RULING ON MOTION TO REMAND Before the court is the Motion to Remand filed by plaintiff Allyson Standiford. opposed.1 A Magistrate Judge's Report was issued March 30, 2010 Record document number 4. The motion is recommending that the plaintiff's motion be denied.2 Before the district judge could rule on the motion, the parties consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and an Order of Reference was issued.3 No objection was filed to the Magistrate Judge's Report or the recommendation. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge's Report is adopted as the ruling on the plaintiff's Motion to Remand, and the Motion to Remand is denied. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, August 19, 2010. STEPHEN C. RIEDLINGER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Record document number 5. Plaintiff memorandum. Record document number 8. 2 3 1 filed a reply Record document number 10. Record document numbers 12, 15 and 18. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?