Stockstill v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al

Filing 33

OPINION Adopting 26 and 29 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The Supplemental and Amending Motion to Remand filed by the pla shall be denied. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 04/13/2011. (NLT)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

MELINDA STOCKSTILL, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS
NUMBER 10-95-FJP-SCR
WAL-MART STORES, INC., ET AL.
OPINION
After independently reviewing the entire record in this case
and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Reports1 to
which objections2 were filed:
IT IS ORDERED that the Supplemental and Amending Motion to
Remand filed by plaintiff Melinda Stockstill, individually and on
behalf

of

her

minor

children,

Emily

Stockstill

and

Maizie

Stockstill, shall be denied.3
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, April 13, 2011.

S
FRANK J. POLOZOLA

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

1

Rec. Doc. Nos. 26 and 29.

2

Rec. Doc. Nos. 25 and 28(filed into the record by Wal-Mart
Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart of Louisiana, LLC, and Unarco Industries,
LLC as oppositions to the motions to remand).
3

Rec. Doc. Nos. 21 and 27.

Doc#47171